Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

The Western Hemisphere. General term for the Americas following their discovery by Europeans, thus setting them in contradistinction to the Old World of Africa, Europe, and Asia.

Moderators: Minimalist, MichelleH

Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby hardaker » Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:46 pm

Hi Everybody,
Great News (for some).
The Valsequillo film is finally available to view for free.

SUPPRESSED: New Evidence of Early Man
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koYWznEIV50

Been out a week, ~40k hits already.
(If it is kosher, I can send along info where the DVD can be bought; it includes another disc with interviews that did not survive the cut, along with a 20 minute presentation by Mike detailing his modern inset hypothesis.)

Party on!
Chris
Chris Hardaker
The First American: The Suppressed Story of the People Who Discovered the New World [ https://www.amazon.com/First-American-S ... 1564149420 ]
hardaker
 
Posts: 189
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:16 pm

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby Minimalist » Wed Sep 12, 2012 12:12 am

Thanks, Chris. I'll post the link on a few other sites for you.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Minimalist
 
Posts: 15445
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby Ernie L » Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:32 pm

Who would ever have imagined that the peopling of America would ever create such passion. Intrigue and skullduggery have already been alleged. I fully expect someday to read about lawsuits, fist fights and maybe even a car torching over the issue. :D

I am having a very hard time with one thing though..The magnified pics of the sand and clay layers were shown..and said to look identical..only to me they looked nothing like each other. The photos of the clay and sand layer(proposed river cut) also clearly showed (to my eyes) two different materials and a definite boundary... Then it was stated that there was no river cut.....the sand and clay layers were the same material..just morphing one into the other.....hmm...I would think if that were so then it would not be quite so black and white..where is the gray ?........I am of course no subject matter expert on things having to do with any of this...just a life long interested by stander so to speak.

The film was fun to watch..I thank you for that.
Regards Ernie
User avatar
Ernie L
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:25 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby dannan14 » Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:47 pm

So was the Valsequillo site covered in Forbidden Archaeology? i would check myself, but i'm in the middle of moving and my books are already packed :(

This video made me think that some of the fantastic arguments in Forbidden may be a bit more plausible. Thanks for posting the link!
dannan14
 
Posts: 481
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:47 pm

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby hardaker » Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:49 pm

Yes, Cremo covered it; and it was involved in the show, the mysterious origins of man, in the 1990s.
Chris Hardaker
The First American: The Suppressed Story of the People Who Discovered the New World [ https://www.amazon.com/First-American-S ... 1564149420 ]
hardaker
 
Posts: 189
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:16 pm

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby Farpoint » Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:03 am

In the video Dr. Waters referred to a drawing of the stratigraphy of the site, is there a recent paper available that details this information?

I have searched Google Scholar.
I'm sorry, my responses are limited. You must ask the right question.

"The track of a glacier is as unmistakable as that of a man or a bear, and is as significant and trustworthy as any other legible inscription"
John Strong Newberry; 1873
User avatar
Farpoint
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 4:53 am
Location: Madison, Ohio

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby Minimalist » Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:15 am

Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Minimalist
 
Posts: 15445
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby Farpoint » Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:18 am



When it arrives I will, but, I would like to see the drawing Waters was referring to, directly.
I'm sorry, my responses are limited. You must ask the right question.

"The track of a glacier is as unmistakable as that of a man or a bear, and is as significant and trustworthy as any other legible inscription"
John Strong Newberry; 1873
User avatar
Farpoint
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 4:53 am
Location: Madison, Ohio

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby countrcultur » Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:44 pm

Hey Guys,

I've just been reading up on this topic. Have the dates for this site been adequately disproved in any way? If not are there theories of origin that go along with these dates/evience? it always made a lot more sense to me that people came north as ice receded or land became ice-free. I think that people may have came from asia at around the same time but it seems like very different populations. There are big cultural and physical gaps between native people along the west coast and the far north and those from the interior. I am half cree myself and have been told that it's always been known that the people on the other side of the mountains are different from us. lol. Reading accounts of the first or early europeans mapping and exploring the west of canada they also noted that cree and blackfoot people didnt like to go beyond the rockies and told stories or wars and clashes with the coastal tribes. It just always seemed likely to me that there were different migrations of very unrelated people. This valsequillo dating and it being south seem to fit this view. So am I way off here? Any help greatly appreciated, thanks.
countrcultur
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby Minimalist » Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:35 pm

So am I way off here?


No, you can't be. With Clovis-First going down for the count ( with its insistence that ALL migration to the new world came via the Bering Land Bridge) we are back to a free for all situation.

Image

Those ocean currents are intriguing...especially the South Equatorial current from West Africa to South American and into the Carribean.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Minimalist
 
Posts: 15445
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby Farpoint » Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:08 pm

I think that the only migration that everyone agrees on is the late arriving Inuits.
I'm sorry, my responses are limited. You must ask the right question.

"The track of a glacier is as unmistakable as that of a man or a bear, and is as significant and trustworthy as any other legible inscription"
John Strong Newberry; 1873
User avatar
Farpoint
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 4:53 am
Location: Madison, Ohio

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby Ernie L » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:37 am

Farpoint wrote:I think that the only migration that everyone agrees on is the late arriving Inuits.

yes indeed..real attention hogs those Inuits..always the last to make an entrance !
Regards Ernie
User avatar
Ernie L
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:25 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby kbs2244 » Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:17 am

Check out the evidence of independent northward and southward migrations the guy in my post “All Around and Through South America” puts forth.

Once you accept the deep water ocean sailing ability it makes a lot of sense.
kbs2244
 
Posts: 2320
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:47 pm

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby countrcultur » Sat Sep 15, 2012 1:41 pm

what about valsequillo? is it worth referencing, has it held up?
countrcultur
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: Valsequillo 2: Revenge of the Diatoms

Postby dannan14 » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:57 pm

hardaker wrote:Yes, Cremo covered it; and it was involved in the show, the mysterious origins of man, in the 1990s.


Thanks Chris! i'll open it back up once i get settled.
dannan14
 
Posts: 481
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:47 pm

Next

Return to New World

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron