Ancient Aliens.

Here's where you get off topic and off center....Keep it nice, keep it clean, no sniping, no flaming. After that, anything goes.

Moderators: Minimalist, MichelleH

Ancient Aliens.

Postby Frank Harrist » Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:52 pm

I'm watching "Ancient Aliens" right now just to piss ya'll off. HEE HEE! :twisted:
Frank Harrist
 

Re: Ancient Aliens.

Postby Minimalist » Sat Nov 08, 2014 11:42 pm

Do you like the guy with the hair, Frank?
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Minimalist
 
Posts: 15378
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Ancient Aliens.

Postby Frank Harrist » Sun Nov 09, 2014 1:58 pm

Yeah! Giorgio (sp) is my favorite! Man, they really reach for some of these theories. It's actually pretty funny sometimes. Most of the time I fall asleep before it's over. ;) :wink:
Frank Harrist
 

Re: Ancient Aliens.

Postby Frank Harrist » Sun Nov 09, 2014 2:06 pm

The theory that the Sphinx was originally carved in the shape of Anubis is interesting, though there is absolutely nothing to support it. Schocke is still adamant that it's possibly as old as 10k yrs. Makes as much sense as any of the other weird shit that people have theorized about it. Also, there could be two of them. I like this kind of stuff because it opens my mind. I know 99% of it is bullshit, but it's fun, entertaining, and thought provoking. The exact reasons I watch TV.

"Let us not be defined by our hatreds." Frank Nolan
Frank Harrist
 

Re: Ancient Aliens.

Postby Minimalist » Sun Nov 09, 2014 7:47 pm

I thought it was a lion's head originally?


I just find it interesting that the geologists (Schock and Reader) while quibbling over the date (and neither satisfying the Egyptologists in the process) use hard scientific principles to dispute the 4th Dynasty claims of the Egyptologists who, last I heard, were still hung up on Khafre building it because it is near the second pyramid which they think he built....for reasons which are as soft as the sphinx attribution.

Now I live in a desert and every summer we get a first hand look at what happens when there is a sudden cloudburst on a sun-baked desert landscape. There are amazing flash floods but they are exceedingly localized and last a very short time. Schock's case for sustained rainfall seems more credible.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Minimalist
 
Posts: 15378
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Ancient Aliens.

Postby Frank Harrist » Fri Nov 21, 2014 5:27 pm

New theory is that it was a jackal to begin with and the nose broke off so they made it into a man's head. It's possible, but there's no evidence to support this assertion. It's all guessing. I've heard so many wild theories about the sphinx and almost any of them could be true. We'll probably never know.
Frank Harrist
 

Re: Ancient Aliens.

Postby Harte » Sat Nov 29, 2014 3:36 pm

Minimalist wrote:I thought it was a lion's head originally?

I just find it interesting that the geologists (Schock and Reader) while quibbling over the date (and neither satisfying the Egyptologists in the process) use hard scientific principles to dispute the 4th Dynasty claims of the Egyptologists who, last I heard, were still hung up on Khafre building it because it is near the second pyramid which they think he built....for reasons which are as soft as the sphinx attribution.

Then you're either purposefuilly mischaracterizing the situation using a straw man argument or you're not listening very well.
Two different types of Khufu's name appear in worker markings in sealed chambers in the GP, there have been two different C14 assays of the site put5ing it squarely in the 4th Dynasty, and a record of shipments of stone found at an ancient port in Egypt recently explicitly mentions stones meant for Khufu's pyramid.

Minimalist wrote:Now I live in a desert and every summer we get a first hand look at what happens when there is a sudden cloudburst on a sun-baked desert landscape. There are amazing flash floods but they are exceedingly localized and last a very short time. Schock's case for sustained rainfall seems more credible.

This is an example of what I stated. Perhaps you should understand that, while Schoch uses rainfall to corroborate what he claims, his date is in no way based on such a thin line of evidence.

He bases his date for the sphinx entirely on subsurface weathering of bedrock in the Sphinx enclosure which is due to exposure to the air, and not affected by covering sands or any amount of rain. His use of rainfall (which BTW turns out to be more than was thought at the time of Schoch's paper) is purely serendipitous.

Harte
Man is a credulous animal, and must believe something; in the absence of good grounds for belief, he will be satisfied with bad ones.

Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Harte
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 4:11 pm
Location: Memphis Tennessee

Re: Ancient Aliens.

Postby Minimalist » Sat Nov 29, 2014 5:52 pm

Image

Schoch notes that the erosion pattern on the enclosure wall shows signs of rainfall erosion. Are you suggesting that the enclosure was built before it had anything to enclose?

Also, what does Khufu have to do with Khafre?
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Minimalist
 
Posts: 15378
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona


Return to The 'Everything Else' Forum.....

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest