The Battle of Los Angeles

Here's where you get off topic and off center....Keep it nice, keep it clean, no sniping, no flaming. After that, anything goes.

Moderators: Minimalist, MichelleH

The Battle of Los Angeles

Postby uniface » Sat Mar 01, 2014 5:30 am

It occurs to me (to the extent that anybody cares) (if there even is one) that the mechanism by which people dismiss "fringe" ideas as presumptive lunacy goes something like this : an idea or concept prompts a mental data search ; the search report comes back as "no data in file," and that's that. This is mistaken for "There is no evidence for that." (Actually, there may be a ton of it -- it's just not in the dismissor's memory banks) (the mental image of something is mistakenly taken to be an accurate representation of the reality it images).

ANYHOW. If you've got five minutes, this is interesting :
http://www.theufochronicles.com/2014/02 ... f-los.html

Familiarity changes perspective.
uniface
 

Re: The Battle of Los Angeles

Postby Frank Harrist » Sat Mar 01, 2014 9:56 am

Uniface, I sent you a PM.
Frank Harrist
 

Re: The Battle of Los Angeles

Postby circumspice » Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:31 pm

Wholesale acceptance is as idiotic as wholesale dismissal. Nuff said? :lol:
"Damn with faint praise, assent with civil leer, and, without sneering, teach the rest to sneer." ~ Alexander Pope
User avatar
circumspice
 
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:10 pm

Re: The Battle of Los Angeles

Postby Frank Harrist » Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:42 pm

circumspice wrote:Wholesale acceptance is as idiotic as wholesale dismissal. Nuff said? :lol:


And vice versa. Either one is idiotic.
:lol:
Frank Harrist
 


Return to The 'Everything Else' Forum.....

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests