Digit wrote:Or someone dedicated to improving your knowledge of the English language, at least you won't now make the same error again. Your thanks taken for granted.
Digit wrote:May I take this oportunity of pointing out that I simply made a technical observation in an attempt at clarification. No report I have ever seen describes these structures other than as pyramids, possibly qualified as step, flat topped, or truncated.
Now it may have escaped your notice RS that only you have managed to make an issue of my observation. I wonder why that might be?
Digit wrote:Which simply leaves me wondering still as to why you remain the only one in step, why you cannot hold a debate without getting snotty?
Why you have failed to understand after all your insults that they have no effect on me at all, so why do you bother?
Digit wrote:Or someone dedicated to improving your knowledge of the English language
Digit wrote:Repeating a load of BS still leaves it as BS of course.
Digit wrote:You pointed out that this was an Archaeological forum, I agree. It is not therefore an organ for you to spill your bile against any of us.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest