Feminoids vs. Science

The science or study of primitive societies and the nature of man.

Moderators: Minimalist, MichelleH

Feminoids vs. Science

Postby uniface » Sat Jul 19, 2014 10:23 am

A recent outbreak of political correctness has resulted in the termination of a Scientific American blogger who committed the unspeakable crime of giving a favorable review to a controversial book on genetics by New York Times writer Nicholas Wade and for defending Richard Feynman against exaggerated accusations of sexism.

Then, the science writing community expressed bewildering outrage over a cover photo from the journal Science that depicted transgendered prostitutes for a special issue about AIDS. Of course, banging a hooker is a risk factor for acquiring HIV, and the spread of HIV via prostitution has become a giant problem in places like China. Initially, the faux outrage was directed at the supposed objectification of women, particularly because the photo does not show their faces. But, the photos were of transgendered individuals, not biological women. Besides, showing their faces surely would have been criticized as a violation of privacy. Either way, Science loses.


http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2014
uniface
 

Re: Feminoids vs. Science

Postby uniface » Sat Jul 19, 2014 10:25 am

While anecdotes from Feynman's own book show that he was a jerk to women in certain settings, there's no evidence that Feynman ever discriminated against women in science. In actuality, it was quite the opposite. As Julia Lipman wrote in 1999:

"Feynman took the side of a female Caltech professor who brought a sexual discrimination complaint against the school. He encouraged his younger sister’s career as a physicist even though their parents didn’t believe that women should pursue scientific careers."

The article earned some controversy on Twitter, but generally prompted diverse, reflective discussion. Not a big deal.

Ashutosh Jogalekar's Feynman article appeared last Friday. The next day, it was taken down, and Jogalekar was abruptly excused from Scientific American's blog network. (The article has since been reposted "in the interest of openness and transparency.")

Scientific American editor Curtis Brainard offered an explanation for the dismissal earlier this week. He said that some of Jogalekar's posts lacked clarity, which made them insensitive to "valid concerns that many readers have about past and existing biases and prejudices in our society."


http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/20 ... ogger.html
uniface
 

Re: Feminoids vs. Science

Postby kbs2244 » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:19 pm

Has anybody seen Disney’s “Tar Baby” cartoon shown anywhere lately?
Or, for that matter, even seen it for sale?
Even “Gone With the Wind” has been made scarce.
kbs2244
 
Posts: 2307
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:47 pm


Return to Anthropology and Primitive Societies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest