a biface , a two-sided stone tool

The science or study of primitive societies and the nature of man.

Moderators: Minimalist, MichelleH

a biface , a two-sided stone tool

Postby mike » Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:45 am

how do you know the age of this stone tools?
Attachments
amigdale.jpg
a biface , a two-sided stone tool (from www.pantalica.org )
amigdale.jpg (69.63 KiB) Viewed 4817 times
mike
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:33 pm

Re: a biface , a two-sided stone tool

Postby Minimalist » Fri Jan 06, 2012 6:48 pm

Once it is out of its archaeological context you are forced to compare it to other tools which demonstrate a similar style.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Minimalist
 
Posts: 15443
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: a biface , a two-sided stone tool

Postby mike » Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:36 am

the archaeological context is the Rocky Necropolis of Pantalica which was added to Unesco's World Heritage List in 2005. see http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1200 or also http://www.pantalica.org
Unfortunately the site is so neglected that has not been studied enough and it is unknown the age of caves........
mike
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:33 pm

Re: a biface , a two-sided stone tool

Postby Cognito » Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:47 pm

Looks like an acheulian hand axe to me, but hard to say without knowing where it was picked up and its history.
Natural selection favors the paranoid
User avatar
Cognito
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:37 am
Location: Southern California

Re: a biface , a two-sided stone tool

Postby mike » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:27 pm

it was picked in the rocky necropolis of Pantalica which is dated in the thirteenth century before Christ but the type of stone (flint) does not exist in the area.it could have been brought there by travelers men?
mike
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:33 pm

Re: a biface , a two-sided stone tool

Postby kbs2244 » Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:26 pm

Oh boy, you are talking the middle of the Mediterranean.
Other than the Rift Valley of Africa, the most traveled to, and through, part of the planet.

With out real good surrounding, and easily dateable, evidence, you are holding what is politely called an “Out of Place Artifact.”

Good luck
kbs2244
 
Posts: 2320
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:47 pm

Re: a biface , a two-sided stone tool

Postby Cognito » Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:04 am

it was picked in the rocky necropolis of Pantalica which is dated in the thirteenth century before Christ but the type of stone (flint) does not exist in the area.

The material doesn't look like flint to me ... more like chalcedony or jasper. Hard to tell without the original link. KBS is right, without provenance the article cannot be reliably dated.
Natural selection favors the paranoid
User avatar
Cognito
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:37 am
Location: Southern California

Re: a biface , a two-sided stone tool

Postby mike » Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:30 am

seems to me flint.........

see photo from another aspect
Attachments
photo1.jpg
photo1.jpg (106.37 KiB) Viewed 4744 times
mike
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:33 pm


Return to Anthropology and Primitive Societies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests

cron