Neanderthals in a boat?

The Old World is a reference to those parts of Earth known to Europeans before the voyages of Christopher Columbus; it includes Europe, Asia and Africa.

Moderators: Minimalist, MichelleH

Neanderthals in a boat?

Postby Cognito » Wed Dec 28, 2016 2:03 pm

Neanderthals in a boat? Not such a far-fetched notion after all

McMaster University research bolsters theory that our primitive cousins were more sophisticated than previously thought.
See: https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2016 ... r-all.html :D
Natural selection favors the paranoid
User avatar
Cognito
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:37 am
Location: Southern California

Re: Neanderthals in a boat?

Postby Minimalist » Wed Dec 28, 2016 5:53 pm

Ah.......... boats.


Now we all know the anti-boat crowd will insist that the wind blew them to Naxos.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Minimalist
 
Posts: 15417
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Neanderthals in a boat?

Postby circumspice » Wed Dec 28, 2016 6:21 pm

Minimalist wrote:Ah.......... boats.


Now we all know the anti-boat crowd will insist that the wind blew them to Naxos.


On a raft of seaweed... :lol:
LUCEO NON URO
User avatar
circumspice
 
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:10 pm

Re: Neanderthals in a boat?

Postby Minimalist » Wed Dec 28, 2016 6:27 pm

Yes, of course.

Or maybe the "devil" put them there to test our faith?
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Minimalist
 
Posts: 15417
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Neanderthals in a boat?

Postby Cognito » Thu Dec 29, 2016 11:51 am

On a raft of seaweed... :lol:

Of course, a raft of seaweed since we all "know" that all archaics were grunting brutes, right? The cache of front-weighted javelins at Shoeningen would indicate otherwise. The occupation of Naxos would require reproduction of an island population unless one person made all the points. To consider reproduction requires admitting that a group of individuals took boats and/or rafts to the island. :shock:

Yes, Min. This is obviously the hand of the devil at work! :twisted:
Natural selection favors the paranoid
User avatar
Cognito
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:37 am
Location: Southern California

Re: Neanderthals in a boat?

Postby Minimalist » Thu Dec 29, 2016 4:52 pm

I knew it.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Minimalist
 
Posts: 15417
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Neanderthals in a boat?

Postby circumspice » Fri Dec 30, 2016 9:43 am

Most people still blindly accept what Victorian "gentleman" archaeologists proposed as facts despite there being no supporting data. Such 'facts' as: Hatshepsut was a ball busting, evil stepmother type usurper... (real facts & data notwithstanding), Neandertals were stupid, inarticulate, primitive brutes who could barely clothe themselves in rotting untanned leather, could barely make fire & still somehow survived several ice ages in Europe & Asia before H. sapiens came out of Africa, that black Africans couldn't have built Great Zimbabwe simply because they weren't white... They also propounded that H. sapiens were the crown of creation.

Hmmm... I'm seeing a trend here... You're stupid & venal if you're an archaic human, a female and/or not white?

I'm currently reading a Christmas gift, the formerly seminal work by Arthur Weigall called Akhenaten ~ Pharaoh of Egypt. It was published in 1910 & revised in 1922. I see a patronizing tone in his manner of dealing with the subject of his peers who happened to disagree with his beliefs on the subject matter. He goes to great lengths (modestly too!) to highlight his great erudition & his great personal importance as Inspector General of Antiquities. *yawn* I first read this book decades ago, before many of the most exciting discoveries were made. It seems kind of sad & pathetic now. It really shows the Victorian perspective of the time.
LUCEO NON URO
User avatar
circumspice
 
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:10 pm

Re: Neanderthals in a boat?

Postby Minimalist » Fri Dec 30, 2016 2:41 pm

Hmmm... I'm seeing a trend here... You're stupid & venal if you're an archaic human, a female and/or not white?



Or British. Let's not forget what led to Piltdown Man.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Minimalist
 
Posts: 15417
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona


Return to Old World

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron