E.P. Grondine wrote:Hi skiessa -
I find it sad that no translation of the Red Sea document is easily available on line.
You have to remember that geologists working at Giza found a quarry immediately in front of the Great Pyramid,
and that no less a "skeptic" than Christopher Dunne himself discovered a couple of rock saw pits in the same area.
(You may want to check out his videos on Youtube.)
Besides the workmen's quarters at Giza,
there was also an earlier pyramid which collapsed during its construction.
In my view, excavations there through that collapse debris
are likely to reveal exact details of the ancient Egyptian's methods of pyramid construction.
Just because we do not know definitively how and why they did i right now,
obtaining those answers is mainly a question of money.
With so may ruins, and so little money,
questions as to the pyramids are likely to be definitively answered only some time later on.
In the meantime, there are a lot of people who will try to use those "mysteries"
to sell you a lot of shit.
I have to quote my earlier post on this one: the world would have so much fewer ancient alien stories if the same burden of proof would apply to archaeology which applies to every other field of science. the bigger the suggestion, the bigger the burden of proof. i'm still looking for the distinction between shit and a mainstream view which is widely accepted without any physical evidence, but which one still cannot criticize or question without being completely ridiculed. just imagine if the physics would treat some hypothesis this way: saying that it shall remain the default until we find the evidence that supports it. in such case we would be having this argument with swords lol.