PPN notes

The Old World is a reference to those parts of Earth known to Europeans before the voyages of Christopher Columbus; it includes Europe, Asia and Africa.

Moderators: Minimalist, MichelleH

Re: PPN notes

Postby Minimalist » Thu Aug 06, 2015 10:27 am

And of course there is no reason to assume that then, as now, the larger, more prosperous and populous towns were closer to the sea. Mankind has always had an affinity for the sea.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Minimalist
 
Posts: 15552
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: PPN notes

Postby E.P. Grondine » Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:56 am

E.P. Grondine
 

Re: PPN notes

Postby E.P. Grondine » Sun Nov 01, 2015 12:21 pm

Gobekli Tepe news letter:

https://www.academia.edu/6280624/G%C3%B ... etter_2014

For the production and use of beer in Egypt in a religious festival see:

http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/ccc/ce102103.html

For relations between Egypt and Byblos, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byblos

and the Thoth lore
E.P. Grondine
 

Re: PPN notes

Postby E.P. Grondine » Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:32 am

X mt DNA shows up again:

https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot ... VZKCZgh.97

And where the hell is the original discussion: "Was Gobekli Tepe a henge?"
E.P. Grondine
 

Re: PPN notes

Postby Tiompan » Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:49 am

The El Portalon results are hardly new ,and it's not particularly surprising to find mt DNA X present .

There never was a discussion "Was Gobekli Tepe a henge?" . It clearly wasn't . Only you could manage to think it that it was . Read the literature , the excavation reports etc , nobody who knows anything about the site ever suggested that it was .
You did however ask that question about 3 years ago .
Tiompan
 
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:13 am

Re: PPN notes

Postby E.P. Grondine » Thu Mar 15, 2018 7:37 am

Three years, and we still can not agree on the definition of "henge".
Nor can we agree to let the matter rest.
E.P. Grondine
 

Re: PPN notes

Postby Tiompan » Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:14 am

E.P. Grondine wrote:Three years, and we still can not agree on the definition of "henge".
Nor can we agree to let the matter rest.


It is not 3 years ,it's 'closer to 8 . You have been told this many times too , does nothing stick ?
It is not a disagreement , there is a proper definition of the term that is accepted worldwide including America by people who know about the subject .
The proper definition with multiple separate links , is nothing like the two you made up . In contrast to the multiple links highlighting where you get it wrong ,you have never supplied any supporting evidence to show that anyone with any knowledge about the subject agrees with your definition .
You won't let the matter rest and accept your error . I just keep replying to your crap .
Tiompan
 
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:13 am

Re: PPN notes

Postby circumspice » Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:38 am

E.P. Grondine wrote:X mt DNA shows up again:

https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot ... VZKCZgh.97

And where the hell is the original discussion: "Was Gobekli Tepe a henge?"


This particular article makes no mention of any haplogroup whatsoever, be it from mtDNA, Y-DNA or autosomal DNA. Where the hell do you come up with these ideas of yours EP???
"Damn with faint praise, assent with civil leer, and, without sneering, teach the rest to sneer." ~ Alexander Pope
User avatar
circumspice
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:10 pm

Re: PPN notes

Postby E.P. Grondine » Fri Mar 16, 2018 7:56 am

Wrong link. Here it is, in all its detail:

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/03/06/1717762115
E.P. Grondine
 

Re: PPN notes

Postby Tiompan » Fri Mar 16, 2018 8:23 am

E.P. Grondine wrote:Wrong link. Here it is, in all its detail:

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/03/06/1717762115


That's what I was referring to in "The El Portalon results are hardly new ,and it's not particularly surprising to find mt DNA X present . ".
Tiompan
 
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:13 am

Previous

Return to Old World

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron